![]() The second best is to meet up with Fine Contrast instead to maybe 30-35 or of your choise. The best advice is just pull MIcrocontrast as far as it is possible to the negative side since too much Microcontrast gives alot of problems with dirty skies. What I have found have worked the best for me is still Photolab - not because of Lens correction sharpening or Deep Prime or make RAW through repro photo because it´s not really but the RAW either since all the normal tools that works with RAW with digitally born images doesn´t work at all on these images. It just really smears all out so I prefer the coarser patina these images normally get by my normal method. I once used it maybe 15 years ago but a new test didn´t convince me at all. In fact, I tested it after a tip a few days here in the forum. ![]() ![]() I have scanned a lot of coarse-grained Agfa for a long time and NeatImage cant´t do all that much to these noise problems either. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |